What arithmetic is worth doing?
Per-seat pricing is easy to approve because the first invoice is small. The cost curve is the problem: every hire raises the bill on every tool that person needs, and nobody re-approves the decision when that happens.
Once headcount on a single tool passes roughly 30, comparing the annual subscription against a one-time build stops being a philosophical argument and becomes an arithmetic one. Multiply the seat price by the headcount you expect in 24 months, not the headcount you have today. The same discipline shows up when we price AI consulting for a small business and when we choose build versus buy inside AI for Small Business work.
What should the two-year arithmetic include?
- Count seats you will need in two years, not this quarter
- Add the cost of the integrations you maintain around the tool
- Compare that total against a build plus its running cost
Sometimes the subscription still wins. That is a fine answer, and it is worth knowing that it is the answer rather than assuming it.



